• editor.aipublications@gmail.com
  • Track Your Paper
  • Contact Us
  • ISSN: 2456-7817

International Journal Of Engineering, Business And Management(IJEBM)

E-commerce Education from Vitality- an Example of Banking Management in Taiwan on AI models

Sung-Yi Hsieh , Hsiao-Chi Ling , Chiao Chao , Ruei-Yuan Wang


International Journal of Engineering, Business And Management(IJEBM), Vol-9,Issue-4, October - December 2025, Pages 8-16 , 10.22161/ijebm.9.4.2

Download | Downloads : 2 | Total View : 571

Article Info: Received: 08 Nov 2025; Received in revised form: 05 Dec 2025; Accepted: 13 Dec 2025; Available online: 17 Dec 2025

Cite this Article: APA | ACM | Chicago | Harvard | IEEE | MLA | Vancouver | Bibtex

Share

This study analyzes the dimensions of the vitality of development for banking systems. Fuzzy synthetic decisions are used to construct and evaluate a vitality of training, assigning, and development index to offer banks new perspectives and methods of assessment. In this study, we analyze the vitality index for the human resources development of the banking system. With the rapid development and significant successfulness of various deep learning techniques in artificial intelligence (AI), AI has led to a significant evolution in both academic and industrial fields. For the uncertainty, the factor weight for the vitality index will be determined by using the fuzzy Delphi method (FDM). Through the process of fuzzy synthetic decision (FSD), the model calculated the relative importance for each dimension of the mean factor. In this empirical study of commercial banks, the priority ranks for the five dimensions are as follows: Efficiency, Leadership, Business Culture, Talents and Strategy.

Banking, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Vitality Index (VI), E-commerce, Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM), Fuzzy Synthetic Decision (FSD)

[1] Boer, M., Stevens, G. W. J. M., Finkenauer, C., & van den Eijnden, R. J. J. M. (2022). The complex association between social media use intensity and adolescent wellbeing: A longitudinal investigation of five factors that may affect the association. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, Article 107084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107084
[2] Bryde, D. J. (2005). Methods for managing different perspectives of project success, British Journal of Management, 16(2), 119-131.
[3] Chang, P. T., Huang, L. C., and Lin, H. J. (2000). The fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy statistics and membership function fitting and an application to the human resources, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 112, 511-520.
[4] Chang, P. T., and Lee, E. S. (1995). The estimation of normalized fuzzy weights, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 29(5), 21-24.
[5] Chang, I. S., Tasuhiro, Y., Gen, M., and Tozawa, T. (1995). An efficient approach for large scale project planning based on fuzzy Delphi method, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 76, 277-288.
[6] Chow, C. C. and Luk, P. (2005). A strategic service quality approach using analytic hierarchy process, Managing Service Quality, 15(3), 278-289.
[7] Deise, M. V., Nowikow, C. King, P. and Wright, A. (2010). Executive’s Guide to E-business from Tactics to Strategy , New York, U.S.A, John Wiley& Sons.
[8] Kaufmann, A., and Gupta, M. M. (1988). Fuzzy mathematical model in engineering and management science, New York: North-Holland Inc.
[9] Liang, S. K., Chen, K. S., and Hung, Y. H. (2003). Measuring Banking Operation Performance by Applying a Process Capability Index. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, 24(2): 317-328.
[10] Liang, S. K. and Hsieh, S. Y. (2005). An examination of the professional ability index used by banks for training, using the fuzzy Delphi method. Journal of Insurance, 2(1):105-122.
[11] José Eugenio L. (2020). AHP-express: A simplified version of the analytical hierarchy process method, Methods X, 7: 100748. doi:10.1016/j.mex.2019.11.021
[12] Kaban, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education: A science mapping approach. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology, 11(4), 844-861.
[13] Mehra, S., Inman, R. A. and Tuite, G. (1988). A simulation-based comparison of TOC and traditional accounting performance measures in a process industry, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 16(3), 328-342.
[14] Schuman, C. A. and Brent, A. C. (2005). Asset life cycle management: towards improving physical asset performance in the process industry, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 25(6), 566-579.
[15] Szentes, T. (2005). Interpretations, aspects and levels, decisive factors and measuring methods of competitiveness, Society and Economy, 27(1), 5-41.
[16] Tan, S. S. 1994. Living System Theory: A Unifying Conceptual Framework for Management, Singapore Management Review, l6 (2), 78-139.
[17] Xie, H., Hwang, G. J. & Wong, T. L. (2021). Editorial Note: From Conventional AI to Modern AI in Education: Re-examining AI and Analytic Techniques for Teaching and Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 24 (3), 85-88.
[18] Kuo, Y. F. and Chen, L. S. (2002). Using the fuzzy synthetic decision approach to access the performance of university in Taiwan, International Journal of Management, 19(4), 593-604.